STATISTICAL OVERVIEW OF INDIA Vs ENGLAND ODI
India and England have been quite successful teams in past two years and meet each other in Bangalore. Here is a statistical overview of their performances over the years:
In Head to Head records, India pip ahead with 37 wins to 30 and since 2000s, it is still better for India’s 8 to 4 record. At India, host has won 21-13 record and in recent years it has been overwhelmingly in favor of India. Their last 2 visits here had been nightmare to England losing it 5-1 in 2006 and 5-0 in 2008(A series cut short by 26/11 attacks in Mumbai). In World Cup however the stats are equal 3-3. But England has not beaten in India since 1992 in World Cup, losing at home in 1999 and in South Africa in 2003.
Matches | Mat | India won | Eng won | Tie | N.R |
Overall | 70 | 38 | 30 | 0 | 2 |
In India | 34 | 21 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
In World Cup | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Head to Head since 2000 | 34 | 22 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Head to Head since 2007 WC | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
The Performance of teams since 2009 is that India has better W/L ratio since 2009.
Team | Mat | Won | Lost | Tie | N.R |
INDIA | 64 | 37 | 23 | 0 | 4 |
ENGLAND | 47 | 25 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
Bangalore has been a hunting ground for India which has won 11 of its 16 matches and has just lost 1 of 7 matches here since 2000s. The latest one was a big win against the Kiwis by a late 6th wicket partnership between Yusuf Pathan and Tiwary.
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
Indians lead both the batting and bowling charts Head to head. Tendulkar and Srinath lead the Tables. However among the present squad players too, India has an added advantage. Yuvraj Singh has the best average among the players and has 3 of 6 hundreds scored by the Players in both the squads. Harbhajan is third in overall list of bowlers in Head to Head matches and leads the current lot by long way. Among the Century makers, Yuvraj has 3 to his name while Nehra and Sreesanth have a 6 for each and Harbhajan has two 5 wicket hauls. Surprisingly Yuvraj is also among the wickets against England. For England Broad alone has two four wicket hauls.
Player | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Ave | BF | SR | 100 | 50 |
SR Tendulkar (India) | 36 | 36 | 4 | 1335 | 105* | 41.71 | 1516 | 88.06 | 1 | 10 |
Yuvraj Singh (India) | 28 | 27 | 6 | 1129 | 138* | 53.76 | 1122 | 100.62 | 3 | 5 |
V Sehwag (India) | 26 | 26 | 0 | 973 | 126 | 37.42 | 959 | 101.45 | 1 | 7 |
PD Collingwood (Eng) | 33 | 30 | 7 | 865 | 93 | 37.60 | 1050 | 82.38 | 0 | 6 |
KP Pietersen (Eng) | 18 | 18 | 3 | 752 | 111* | 50.13 | 881 | 85.35 | 1 | 6 |
IR Bell (Eng) | 14 | 14 | 1 | 588 | 126* | 45.23 | 676 | 86.98 | 1 | 2 |
MS Dhoni (India) | 18 | 18 | 3 | 501 | 96 | 33.40 | 647 | 77.43 | 0 | 3 |
SM Gavaskar (India) | 18 | 17 | 5 | 436 | 71 | 36.33 | 815 | 53.49 | 0 | 3 |
SK Raina (India) | 12 | 11 | 2 | 343 | 81* | 38.11 | 446 | 76.90 | 0 | 4 |
G Gambhir (India) | 10 | 10 | 0 | 342 | 70 | 34.20 | 422 | 81.04 | 0 | 3 |
MJ Prior (Eng) | 18 | 17 | 1 | 300 | 46 | 18.75 | 416 | 72.11 | 0 | 0 |
AJ Strauss (Eng) | 10 | 10 | 2 | 229 | 74* | 28.62 | 328 | 69.81 | 0 | 2 |
RS Bopara (Eng) | 10 | 9 | 2 | 223 | 60 | 31.85 | 292 | 76.36 | 0 | 2 |
Most Wickets in Head to Head: (Among the Current Players)
Player | Mat | Overs | Mdns | Runs | Wkts | BBI | Ave | Econ | SR | 4 | 5 |
Harbhajan Singh (India) | 22 | 207.0 | 12 | 854 | 35 | 5/31 | 24.40 | 4.12 | 35.4 | 0 | 2 |
JM Anderson (Eng) | 19 | 164.0 | 16 | 864 | 26 | 4/23 | 33.23 | 5.26 | 37.8 | 1 | 0 |
Yuvraj Singh (India) | 28 | 124.0 | 3 | 636 | 18 | 4/28 | 35.33 | 5.12 | 41.3 | 1 | 0 |
SCJ Broad (Eng) | 12 | 109.2 | 8 | 608 | 16 | 4/51 | 38.00 | 5.56 | 41.0 | 2 | 0 |
A Nehra (India) | 7 | 54.2 | 3 | 236 | 13 | 6/23 | 18.15 | 4.34 | 25.0 | 0 | 1 |
MM Patel (India) | 9 | 59.4 | 4 | 318 | 12 | 3/18 | 26.50 | 5.32 | 29.8 | 0 | 0 |
S Sreesanth (India) | 4 | 26.5 | 1 | 163 | 10 | 6/55 | 16.30 | 6.07 | 16.1 | 0 | 1 |
PERFORMANCE IN PAST 2 YEARS
Since the last two years both the teams have been among the best lot and India has consistently been in 2nd behind the Australians while England has been in top 5 too. Among the players in squad, Dhoni, Gambhir and Kohli have been terrific with the bat in last two years and Kohli has been more so last year. Strauss with Bell and Collingwood lead the English table. Both the teams would expect their talisman – Yuvraj and Pieterson, both not in great form to fire now. Especially Yuvraj for all his liking to English attack has best chance to get back in form.
Coming to the bowlers, Nehra surprisingly heads the Indian table since 2009 while Broad and Swann been brilliant for the English. A lot will depend on how Swann is played by the Indian batters known for their liking to spin. Harbhajan has meanwhile always enjoyed England as opponents.
England Batsmen since 2009
43 | 43 | 1 | 1720 | 154 | 40.95 | 1968 | 87.39 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 189 | 14 | |
40 | 39 | 8 | 1288 | 105* | 41.54 | 1633 | 78.87 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 85 | 25 | |
19 | 19 | 2 | 920 | 137 | 54.11 | 1171 | 78.56 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 70 | 0 | |
22 | 22 | 3 | 569 | 49 | 29.94 | 720 | 79.02 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 44 | 12 | |
29 | 25 | 5 | 567 | 87 | 28.35 | 716 | 79.18 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 54 | 1 | |
24 | 23 | 0 | 509 | 78 | 22.13 | 639 | 79.65 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 49 | 7 | |
28 | 22 | 2 | 427 | 48* | 21.35 | 491 | 86.96 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 10 | |
31 | 25 | 10 | 404 | 80 | 26.93 | 431 | 93.73 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 0 | |
12 | 12 | 2 | 326 | 84* | 32.60 | 454 | 71.80 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0 | |
19 | 16 | 7 | 258 | 60* | 28.66 | 319 | 80.87 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 1 |
England Bowlers since 2009
32 | 282.3 | 14 | 1542 | 64 | 4/39 | 24.09 | 5.45 | 26.4 | 6 | 0 | |
37 | 331.3 | 21 | 1722 | 59 | 5/23 | 29.18 | 5.19 | 33.7 | 1 | 1 | |
30 | 229.0 | 3 | 1002 | 44 | 5/28 | 22.77 | 4.37 | 31.2 | 2 | 1 | |
31 | 262.3 | 10 | 1369 | 37 | 4/28 | 37.00 | 5.21 | 42.5 | 1 | 0 | |
40 | 198.0 | 3 | 952 | 27 | 3/16 | 35.25 | 4.80 | 44.0 | 0 | 0 | |
19 | 154.0 | 3 | 781 | 15 | 3/41 | 52.06 | 5.07 | 61.6 | 0 | 0 | |
9 | 80.0 | 5 | 394 | 14 | 3/41 | 28.14 | 4.92 | 34.2 | 0 | 0 | |
28 | 131.0 | 2 | 671 | 12 | 2/34 | 55.91 | 5.12 | 65.5 | 0 | 0 |
Indian Batsman since 2009
53 | 46 | 11 | 1873 | 124 | 53.51 | 2286 | 81.93 | 3 | 12 | 1 | |
41 | 38 | 7 | 1613 | 118 | 52.03 | 1880 | 85.79 | 5 | 11 | 3 | |
42 | 38 | 4 | 1557 | 150* | 45.79 | 1668 | 93.34 | 4 | 8 | 4 | |
33 | 32 | 2 | 1431 | 175 | 47.70 | 1143 | 125.19 | 5 | 3 | 0 | |
56 | 47 | 10 | 1347 | 106 | 36.40 | 1386 | 97.18 | 1 | 8 | 3 | |
26 | 25 | 3 | 1235 | 200* | 56.13 | 1270 | 97.24 | 4 | 3 | 0 | |
44 | 40 | 4 | 1223 | 131 | 33.97 | 1447 | 84.51 | 2 | 8 | 2 | |
34 | 25 | 7 | 606 | 123* | 33.66 | 524 | 115.64 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
38 | 21 | 6 | 214 | 49 | 14.26 | 245 | 87.34 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Indian Bowlers since 2009
45 | 338.5 | 14 | 2002 | 62 | 4/40 | 32.29 | 5.90 | 32.7 | 3 | 0 | |
38 | 316.5 | 6 | 1535 | 45 | 5/56 | 34.11 | 4.84 | 42.2 | 0 | 1 | |
29 | 242.5 | 16 | 1278 | 36 | 3/38 | 35.50 | 5.26 | 40.4 | 0 | 0 | |
44 | 225.4 | 3 | 1119 | 30 | 3/31 | 37.30 | 4.95 | 45.1 | 0 | 0 | |
34 | 146.4 | 1 | 816 | 25 | 3/49 | 32.64 | 5.56 | 35.2 | 0 | 0 | |
18 | 123.2 | 6 | 639 | 23 | 4/29 | 27.78 | 5.18 | 32.1 | 2 | 0 | |
11 | 83.5 | 2 | 600 | 16 | 4/47 | 37.50 | 7.15 | 31.4 | 1 | 0 | |
7 | 66.0 | 3 | 325 | 14 | 3/24 | 23.21 | 4.92 | 28.2 | 0 | 0 |
India holds a slight advantage in the Stats preview. However a lot will depend on how the track behaves and how the batsmen handle spin. Indians have been best players of spin and the world and if they can continue the same, chances of going 2 up in the League is bright.
STATISTICAL OVERVIEW OF INDIA Vs ENGLAND ODIs
India and England have been quite successful teams in past two years and meet each other in Bangalore. Here is a statistical overview of their performances over the years:
In Head to Head records, India pip ahead with 37 wins to 30 and since 2000s, it is still better for India’s 8 to 4 record. At India, host has won 21-13 record and in recent years it has been overwhelmingly in favor of India. Their last 2 visits here had been nightmare to England losing it 5-1 in 2006 and 5-0 in 2008(A series cut short by 26/11 attacks in Mumbai). In World Cup however the stats are equal 3-3. But England has not beaten in India since 1992 in World Cup, losing at home in 1999 and in South Africa in 2003.
Matches | Mat | India won | Eng won | Tie | N.R |
Overall | 70 | 38 | 30 | 0 | 2 |
In India | 34 | 21 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
In World Cup | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Head to Head since 2000 | 34 | 22 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Head to Head since 2007 WC | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
The Performance of teams since 2009 is that India has better W/L ratio since 2009.
Team | Mat | Won | Lost | Tie | N.R |
INDIA | 64 | 37 | 23 | 0 | 4 |
ENGLAND | 47 | 25 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
Bangalore has been a hunting ground for India which has won 11 of its 16 matches and has just lost 1 of 7 matches here since 2000s. The latest one was a big win against the Kiwis by a late 6th wicket partnership between Yusuf Pathan and Tiwary.
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
Indians lead both the batting and bowling charts Head to head. Tendulkar and Srinath lead the Tables. However among the present squad players too, India has an added advantage. Yuvraj Singh has the best average among the players and has 3 of 6 hundreds scored by the Players in both the squads. Harbhajan is third in overall list of bowlers in Head to Head matches and leads the current lot by long way. Among the Century makers, Yuvraj has 3 to his name while Nehra and Sreesanth have a 6 for each and Harbhajan has two 5 wicket hauls. Surprisingly Yuvraj is also among the wickets against England. For England Broad alone has two four wicket hauls.
Most Runs in Head to Head: (Among the Current Players)
Player | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Ave | BF | SR | 100 | 50 |
SR Tendulkar (India) | 36 | 36 | 4 | 1335 | 105* | 41.71 | 1516 | 88.06 | 1 | 10 |
Yuvraj Singh (India) | 28 | 27 | 6 | 1129 | 138* | 53.76 | 1122 | 100.62 | 3 | 5 |
V Sehwag (India) | 26 | 26 | 0 | 973 | 126 | 37.42 | 959 | 101.45 | 1 | 7 |
PD Collingwood (Eng) | 33 | 30 | 7 | 865 | 93 | 37.60 | 1050 | 82.38 | 0 | 6 |
KP Pietersen (Eng) | 18 | 18 | 3 | 752 | 111* | 50.13 | 881 | 85.35 | 1 | 6 |
IR Bell (Eng) | 14 | 14 | 1 | 588 | 126* | 45.23 | 676 | 86.98 | 1 | 2 |
MS Dhoni (India) | 18 | 18 | 3 | 501 | 96 | 33.40 | 647 | 77.43 | 0 | 3 |
SM Gavaskar (India) | 18 | 17 | 5 | 436 | 71 | 36.33 | 815 | 53.49 | 0 | 3 |
SK Raina (India) | 12 | 11 | 2 | 343 | 81* | 38.11 | 446 | 76.90 | 0 | 4 |
G Gambhir (India) | 10 | 10 | 0 | 342 | 70 | 34.20 | 422 | 81.04 | 0 | 3 |
MJ Prior (Eng) | 18 | 17 | 1 | 300 | 46 | 18.75 | 416 | 72.11 | 0 | 0 |
AJ Strauss (Eng) | 10 | 10 | 2 | 229 | 74* | 28.62 | 328 | 69.81 | 0 | 2 |
RS Bopara (Eng) | 10 | 9 | 2 | 223 | 60 | 31.85 | 292 | 76.36 | 0 | 2 |
Most Wickets in Head to Head: (Among the Current Players)
Player | Mat | Overs | Mdns | Runs | Wkts | BBI | Ave | Econ | SR | 4 | 5 |
Harbhajan Singh (India) | 22 | 207.0 | 12 | 854 | 35 | 5/31 | 24.40 | 4.12 | 35.4 | 0 | 2 |
JM Anderson (Eng) | 19 | 164.0 | 16 | 864 | 26 | 4/23 | 33.23 | 5.26 | 37.8 | 1 | 0 |
Yuvraj Singh (India) | 28 | 124.0 | 3 | 636 | 18 | 4/28 | 35.33 | 5.12 | 41.3 | 1 | 0 |
SCJ Broad (Eng) | 12 | 109.2 | 8 | 608 | 16 | 4/51 | 38.00 | 5.56 | 41.0 | 2 | 0 |
A Nehra (India) | 7 | 54.2 | 3 | 236 | 13 | 6/23 | 18.15 | 4.34 | 25.0 | 0 | 1 |
MM Patel (India) | 9 | 59.4 | 4 | 318 | 12 | 3/18 | 26.50 | 5.32 | 29.8 | 0 | 0 |
S Sreesanth (India) | 4 | 26.5 | 1 | 163 | 10 | 6/55 | 16.30 | 6.07 | 16.1 | 0 | 1 |
PERFORMANCE IN PAST 2 YEARS
Since the last two years both the teams have been among the best lot and India has consistently been in 2nd behind the Australians while England has been in top 5 too. Among the players in squad, Dhoni, Gambhir and Kohli have been terrific with the bat in last two years and Kohli has been more so last year. Strauss with Bell and Collingwood lead the English table. Both the teams would expect their talisman – Yuvraj and Pieterson, both not in great form to fire now. Especially Yuvraj for all his liking to English attack has best chance to get back in form.
Coming to the bowlers, Nehra surprisingly heads the Indian table since 2009 while Broad and Swann been brilliant for the English. A lot will depend on how Swann is played by the Indian batters known for their liking to spin. Harbhajan has meanwhile always enjoyed England as opponents.
England Batsmen since 2009
43 | 43 | 1 | 1720 | 154 | 40.95 | 1968 | 87.39 | 3 | 13 | 3 | 189 | 14 | |
40 | 39 | 8 | 1288 | 105* | 41.54 | 1633 | 78.87 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 85 | 25 | |
19 | 19 | 2 | 920 | 137 | 54.11 | 1171 | 78.56 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 70 | 0 | |
22 | 22 | 3 | 569 | 49 | 29.94 | 720 | 79.02 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 44 | 12 | |
29 | 25 | 5 | 567 | 87 | 28.35 | 716 | 79.18 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 54 | 1 | |
24 | 23 | 0 | 509 | 78 | 22.13 | 639 | 79.65 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 49 | 7 | |
28 | 22 | 2 | 427 | 48* | 21.35 | 491 | 86.96 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 10 | |
31 | 25 | 10 | 404 | 80 | 26.93 | 431 | 93.73 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 0 | |
12 | 12 | 2 | 326 | 84* | 32.60 | 454 | 71.80 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0 | |
19 | 16 | 7 | 258 | 60* | 28.66 | 319 | 80.87 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 1 |
England Bowlers since 2009
32 | 282.3 | 14 | 1542 | 64 | 4/39 | 24.09 | 5.45 | 26.4 | 6 | 0 | |
37 | 331.3 | 21 | 1722 | 59 | 5/23 | 29.18 | 5.19 | 33.7 | 1 | 1 | |
30 | 229.0 | 3 | 1002 | 44 | 5/28 | 22.77 | 4.37 | 31.2 | 2 | 1 | |
31 | 262.3 | 10 | 1369 | 37 | 4/28 | 37.00 | 5.21 | 42.5 | 1 | 0 | |
40 | 198.0 | 3 | 952 | 27 | 3/16 | 35.25 | 4.80 | 44.0 | 0 | 0 | |
19 | 154.0 | 3 | 781 | 15 | 3/41 | 52.06 | 5.07 | 61.6 | 0 | 0 | |
9 | 80.0 | 5 | 394 | 14 | 3/41 | 28.14 | 4.92 | 34.2 | 0 | 0 | |
28 | 131.0 | 2 | 671 | 12 | 2/34 | 55.91 | 5.12 | 65.5 | 0 | 0 |
Indian Batsman since 2009
53 | 46 | 11 | 1873 | 124 | 53.51 | 2286 | 81.93 | 3 | 12 | 1 | |
41 | 38 | 7 | 1613 | 118 | 52.03 | 1880 | 85.79 | 5 | 11 | 3 | |
42 | 38 | 4 | 1557 | 150* | 45.79 | 1668 | 93.34 | 4 | 8 | 4 | |
33 | 32 | 2 | 1431 | 175 | 47.70 | 1143 | 125.19 | 5 | 3 | 0 | |
56 | 47 | 10 | 1347 | 106 | 36.40 | 1386 | 97.18 | 1 | 8 | 3 | |
26 | 25 | 3 | 1235 | 200* | 56.13 | 1270 | 97.24 | 4 | 3 | 0 | |
44 | 40 | 4 | 1223 | 131 | 33.97 | 1447 | 84.51 | 2 | 8 | 2 | |
34 | 25 | 7 | 606 | 123* | 33.66 | 524 | 115.64 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
38 | 21 | 6 | 214 | 49 | 14.26 | 245 | 87.34 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Indian Bowlers since 2009
45 | 338.5 | 14 | 2002 | 62 | 4/40 | 32.29 | 5.90 | 32.7 | 3 | 0 | |
38 | 316.5 | 6 | 1535 | 45 | 5/56 | 34.11 | 4.84 | 42.2 | 0 | 1 | |
29 | 242.5 | 16 | 1278 | 36 | 3/38 | 35.50 | 5.26 | 40.4 | 0 | 0 | |
44 | 225.4 | 3 | 1119 | 30 | 3/31 | 37.30 | 4.95 | 45.1 | 0 | 0 | |
34 | 146.4 | 1 | 816 | 25 | 3/49 | 32.64 | 5.56 | 35.2 | 0 | 0 | |
18 | 123.2 | 6 | 639 | 23 | 4/29 | 27.78 | 5.18 | 32.1 | 2 | 0 | |
11 | 83.5 | 2 | 600 | 16 | 4/47 | 37.50 | 7.15 | 31.4 | 1 | 0 | |
7 | 66.0 | 3 | 325 | 14 | 3/24 | 23.21 | 4.92 | 28.2 | 0 | 0 |
India holds a slight advantage in the Stats preview. However a lot will depend on how the track behaves and how the batsmen handle spin. Indians have been best players of spin and the world and if they can continue the same, chances of going 2 up in the League is bright.
No comments:
Post a Comment